Target’s Class Action Settlement In Danger

Target’s Class Action Settlement In Danger

February 7, 2017         Written By John H. Oldshue

Target’s $17 million class action settlement, which would have resolved consumer claims over a 2013 data breach, is imperiled. The Eighth Circuit Court has identified a possible conflict of interest.

The appeal was triggered because the lower court had not seriously investigated claims by a class member, Leif Olson, that certain representatives were not adequately representing the entire class, as some were receiving compensation while the others were not.

Currently, the appeals court has sent the case back to the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota to reconsider class certification. If that court decides the class should not have been certified, the deal could fall through.

“Over 99 percent of the Target data breach class gets nothing in this multimillion dollar settlement, so we are glad that the Eighth Circuit recognizes that the District Court cannot rubber-stamp settlements where class counsel cuts corners on procedural fairness so they can get paid quickly and generously,” objector counsel Melissa Holyoak of the Center for Class Action Fairness in Washington said in an e-mailed statement to Bloomberg.

The settlement, which was approved in November 2016, provides a $10 million fund for customers and $6.75 million for plaintiffs’ attorneys.

The 2013 breach exposed the data of millions of Target customers’ payment cards. Under this settlement, any class member with a documented loss would be compensated first from the fund before remaining funds would be distributed to those with undocumented losses. Those who have not suffered a loss will not be compensated.

Olson argued the named class members, who would be compensated from the fund, should not have been able to represent people like him who had not suffered any losses. His argument is that even those members who did not receive money from the fund were required to release Target of liability for further claims arising from the breach.

This appeal will not affect the $39 million class settlement, which was approved in May 2016, between Target and banks.

The information contained within this article was accurate as of February 7, 2017. For up-to-date
information on any of the terms, cards or offers mentioned above, visit the issuer's website.


About John H. Oldshue

John Oldshue is the creator of He worked for over 15 years in television and won an Emmy award for his reporting. He covers credit card rate issues for
View all posts by John H. Oldshue
Featured Low Interest Card
Top Features : 1.25X miles on every purchase; no annual fee; bonus of 20,000 miles once $1,000 is spent in first 3 months
Featured No Annual Fee Card
Top Features : Earn cash back twice. 1% when you buy plus 1% as you pay; 0% APR for 18 months on balance transfers
Featured Bad Credit Card
Top Features : No Annual Fee; Cash Back match at the end of your first year; Social Security Alerts
Featured Fair Credit Card
Top Features : No annual fee; access to higher credit line after making first 5 monthly payments on time
Featured Limited/No Credit
Top Features : No annual fee; reports to major credit bureaus; access to higher credit line after making first 5 monthly payments on time
Featured Cash Back Card
Top Features : No Annual Fee, Bonus Offer, Cash Back