Supreme Court Will Reassess Sales Tax for Online Retailers

Supreme Court Will Reassess Sales Tax for Online Retailers

October 4, 2017         Written By Natalie Rutledge

The Supreme Court will soon reassess a 25-year-old ruling that governs how online retailers charge (or don’t charge) sales tax for their transactions. The state of South Dakota proposed a writ of certiorari, available on the Retail Litigation Center website, asking the Supreme court to review Quill Corp v. North Dakota from 1992.

In the Quill case, the Supreme Court determined that retailers would not be required to collect state taxes if they did not have a physical location within that state. So a retailer located in Texas would not collect sales tax for a purchase made in Oklahoma, as long as that retailer did not have a physical building in Oklahoma.

Quill Corp was a catalog retailer, and the ruling made sense when catalog sales were at their peak. No one could have predicted how vast the online retail market would become.

The problem now is that web-based sellers are able to bypass sales tax in most cases, putting less money in the states’ pockets. This also encourages shoppers to buy online instead of buying locally because they know they won’t have to pay tax on their purchases. Shoppers are required to enter their address before submitting their payment information for an online purchase, so retailers have the opportunity to easily assess the sales tax for each transaction.

South Dakota has a law requiring out of state retailers to pay state sales tax if they conduct more than $100,000 worth of business within the state, or if they have more than 200 sales in a year. This is designed to protect small online sellers, even though small brick and mortar businesses have to pay tax regardless of their sales volumes.

The petition for certiorari requests an immediate review of the policies. It says that “because States must balance their books each year, they badly need to know whether to count on increased sales-tax collections, or not, for the coming year.”

The information contained within this article was accurate as of October 4, 2017. For up-to-date
information on any of the terms, cards or offers mentioned above, visit the issuer's website.


About Natalie Rutledge

Natalie Rutledge majored in Communications at Mississippi State University. She was in sales for a number of businesses and spent nine years working as a communications advisor to various entities. Natalie can be contacted directly at
View all posts by Natalie Rutledge
Featured Low Interest Card
Top Features : 1.25X miles on every purchase; no annual fee; bonus of 20,000 miles once $1,000 is spent in first 3 months
Featured Cash Back Card
Top Features : No Annual Fee, Bonus Offer, Cash Back
Featured No Annual Fee Card
Top Features : Earn cash back twice. 1% when you buy plus 1% as you pay; 0% APR for 18 months on balance transfers
Featured Bad Credit Card
Top Features : No Annual Fee; Cash Back match at the end of your first year; Social Security Alerts
Featured Fair Credit Card
Top Features : No annual fee; access to higher credit line after making first 5 monthly payments on time
Featured Limited/No Credit
Top Features : No annual fee; reports to major credit bureaus; access to higher credit line after making first 5 monthly payments on time