Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Chase

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Chase

January 25, 2011         Written By Bill Hardekopf

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled today that JPMorgan Chase & Co did not have to provide written notice before increasing interest rates for account holders who defaulted on their credit card payment.

The class-action lawsuit was filed in 2004, five years before the passage of the CARD Act. The CARD Act changed the notification requirements for interest rates hikes, requiring that cardholders now receive 45 days notice on any increase, including default. This decision will likely have little impact on future cases but it will impact pending cases.

In the suit Chase Bank USA v. McCoy, James McCoy accused Chase of violating federal law by retroactively increasing his interest rates after his account was closed following a late payment. Chase argued that its cardmember agreement documented the conditions that McCoy had to adhere to in order to retain the lower interest rate, in addition to the maximum interest rate that could be levied if he violated those terms.

The Supreme Court ruled that under the old federal regulations, the Chase cardmember agreement disclosed the terms of interest rates and the maximum rates that would apply if the terms were violated. Therefore, Chase did not have to provide written notice before raising credit card interest rates to account holders who defaulted on a payment.

This entry was posted in Credit Card News and tagged No tags added

The information contained within this article was accurate as of January 25, 2011. For up-to-date
information on any of the terms, cards or offers mentioned above, visit the issuer's website.


About Bill Hardekopf

Bill Hardekopf is the CEO of and covers the credit card industry from all perspectives. Bill has been involved with personal finance for over 15 years. He is a frequent contributor to Forbes, The Street and The Christian Science Monitor.
View all posts by Bill Hardekopf